The Difference Between Foresight and Fear
There are two things that feel exactly the same from the inside and produce completely different results.
The first one sounds like: How do I get there faster?
The second one sounds like: There's got to be something I'm missing.
Both feel productive. Both feel responsible. Both will keep you at your desk until 10pm on a Tuesday. But one of them is building something. The other is just burning fuel.
A founder I coach had been working on a deal for months. It was almost closed but not yet done. He couldn't move forward on half his plans until it was. He knew that intellectually. But he couldn't sit still.
Every morning he'd wake up and start scanning. OKRs. Org structure. Job descriptions. Employee handbooks. Facility builds. He was pulling threads in every direction, trying to knock something down. Anything. He described it as a constant hum in the back of his head: Is there something else I should be doing?
I asked him a simple question. Was he trying to get somewhere, or was he trying to not miss something?
He paused. Both, he said.
That's where it gets tricky. You're working hard. You're being thorough. It looks like leadership from every angle. But there is a very real difference between foresight and hole-hunting, and most CEOs can't tell which one they're in until the damage is done.
Foresight is calm. It's the puzzle-solving energy. You're looking at the chessboard from above, asking what would happen if you moved this piece instead of that one. It's playful, even. You can hold two ideas at once and see which one is better without panic.
Hole-hunting is anxious. You're staring at the ground. You're scanning for landmines. The energy underneath it is fear. Not strategy. Not planning. Fear that you're missing something, that something is about to go wrong, that you're not doing enough. And because you're a smart, capable CEO, you dress that fear up in the language of diligence. You call it being prepared. It feels like responsibility. It feels like the thing that separates you from the founders who get blindsided.
But when you spend your mornings looking for holes in the ship, you lose the ability to steer it. The holes you're scanning for usually don't exist yet. You're burning energy on problems you don't have, which means you won't have it when the real ones show up.
I told that founder something I've told a lot of CEOs: You don't have any holes right now. Save your ammunition. When they come, and they will, you're going to need the energy you're spending on phantom problems.
I know this because I've been on both sides.
At Joany, my engineers would come to me with a timeline. Two months for this feature. And I'd say, okay, but what would it look like if it took two weeks?
At first they'd resist. They'd list everything that couldn't be included, everything they'd have to cut. But that list was the whole point. Now we were looking at the real meat of what we were building, and everything else fell away. The constraint gave us something tangible to talk about. It pushed all of us to think further.
Nine times out of ten, we'd ship in two weeks, and the thing that "couldn't be cut" turned out to be unnecessary. Not because I was smarter than my engineers. Because the constraint forced everyone into a different mode. We stopped asking how do we build this perfectly? and started asking what's the simplest version that moves us forward? That's foresight. Simplicity gets you further than thoroughness.
This plays out at every scale. Jack Dorsey talked recently about the decision to restructure Block, a 6,000 person public company. The question his leadership team asked wasn't who should we cut? It was what is the minimum number of people we need to keep the service running, stay in compliance, and grow? That's a constraint, not a reaction. And it produced a completely different kind of decision than the alternative, which Dorsey described as the annual 10 or 20 percent cut that companies do with their backs against the wall. One is foresight. The other is hole-hunting at the organizational level. Same pattern. Same two drives that feel identical from inside. Completely different outcomes.
The difference matters because each mode feeds itself. Foresight breeds clarity. You see the board, you make a move, the move reveals the next one. Hole-hunting breeds more hole-hunting. You find one thing that might be a problem, and now you're looking for three more. Every notification becomes a potential threat. You stop being the CEO who builds and start being the CEO who inspects. Your team can feel it. They start bracing too.
How to tell which one you're in
You won't catch it in the moment. It feels too much like real work. But there are signals.
If you're making a list of things to check on, and the list keeps growing, you're hole-hunting. Foresight simplifies. It asks, what's the one thing that moves us forward? Hole-hunting multiplies. It asks, what else could go wrong?
If you're moving between tasks without finishing any of them, jumping from thread to thread, you're hole-hunting. Foresight holds focus. It stays with one thing until that thing is clear. Hole-hunting is restless. It can't stay because staying means you might be missing something somewhere else.
If the feeling underneath your work is urgency without a clear destination, you're hole-hunting. Foresight has a target. I want to get to this number, this milestone, this version of the company. Hole-hunting has a fear. I want to not be caught off guard.
And the most reliable signal: if you're working on things your team should be doing, or things that don't exist yet, or things you already delegated but can't stop checking on, you're not leading. You're managing your anxiety. The work just happens to be the most socially acceptable way to do it.
The deeper question
The instinct to scan for problems doesn't come from the business. It comes from you.
The CEO who can't stop hole-hunting is usually the CEO whose sense of worth is tied to being useful. To being the one who catches the thing before it becomes a thing. To preventing the disaster. If nothing is broken and nobody needs you to fix it, you feel unnecessary. So you look harder. You find something. You fix it. And the cycle starts again.
This is why the in-between moments are so uncomfortable. When the deal hasn't closed yet. When the team is executing and doesn't need you in the room. When things are working and there's nothing to repair. Those moments feel like failure to the hole-hunting CEO, because the only way they know they're doing their job is if they're solving a problem. No problem, no proof.
The shift isn't learning to relax. It's learning to trust that your value doesn't live in what you catch. It lives in where you point.
The next time you sit down in the morning and feel that pull to start scanning, pause. Ask yourself one question: Am I building toward something right now, or am I bracing for something?
If the answer is bracing, close the laptop. Go for a walk. The holes will still be there when you get back. They almost never are.
Reply to share your thoughts — I read every message.
See you next week! 👑
If You Want To Go Deeper...
Here's where to start:
⚫️ Private Coaching: for early and growth-stage entrepreneurs who want to lead with more clarity while increasing their resiliency. See if we're a good fit here.
⚫️ The 20 Hour CEO Self-Paced Course:The frameworks, systems, and playbooks to stop being the bottleneck — on your schedule.
⚫️ The 20 Hour CEO Live Cohort: 3 weeks, 6 live sessions. Bring your actual business, rebuild how it runs, and leave with systems already in motion. Next cohort starts May 15